All Aboard The Crazy-Train

photo of republicans versus democrats pictures
Politics can be a very polarizing area. That is never more true than in an election year.

Both major political parties in US politics tend to make certain points—this year, with attacks on reproductive rights from the GOP and very strong language against same-sex marriage legalization, some of these points are more extreme than ever.

The real problem behind our election system (aside from the fact that democracy itself is a terrifyingly flawed system of government and only our well-crafted Constitution safeguards us from the tyranny of the majority) is not SuperPACS or compulsive lying on the part of certain candidates—it’s the crazies.

The thing about crazies is that they exist in any and all political parties. In the case of, say, white supremacist parties or anarchist parties, they are the parties in question. But both Democrats and Republicans have fringe crazies, and I do not just mean people with far-right or far-left views. The insane members of both sides should alarm you.

Over the past few years in particular, the Democratic Party has, economically, been asking the very wealthy to pay their fair share (which means avoiding tax loopholes that really should not exist in the first place), especially in times of a major financial crisis.

This request has, for some, become the beginning of an attack on “the rich” and a vilification of wealth itself. You guys, I know that not everyone who is wealthy earned their wealth. But some of them did. Many of them did. Being rich is not a cause for shame or for guilt. I want to be rich. In fact, I would love to be one of the one-percent. I just wouldn’t be a dick about it or try to hide my money rather than paying my fair share, just like I did when I worked in a grocery store deli (a glamorous life, as you can imagine).

The Republican Party has, in addition to tightening its position on all matters related to reproductive health (views more extreme than those held by Mitt Romney, in fact), had its fringe members latch on to some of the paranoid and explicitly racist theories about President Obama. Paranoid doubts as to his country of origin and his religious beliefs both have a powerful undercurrent of racism. And it is disturbing.

It is important to realize that neither fringe group represents the parties themselves. The Republican Party is not the Tea Party. If it were, Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann might be the pair of running-mates in this election. But we were spared that nightmare by the primaries. Say what you will about Romney and Ryan (and I will say quite a bit; to begin with, they certainly aren’t McCain Republicans), they are not that pair of . . . terrors.

The Democratic Party is not at war with the wealthy. Period.

The real danger here is when the parties themselves begin to lean towards their fringe members in terms of rhetoric, because they want to inspire their voting base and because, honestly, crazier people tend to be a lot louder than sane people and so their views are more likely to come across as those of the majority.

And that is not the case. But it is a troubling thought. Please do not hop aboard the crazy-train. If you hear a political ally of yours talking about crazy things, please call him or her out on it.



You Might Also Like ...

Unreasonably Awesome: Michael D. Higgins

photo of michael d higgins pictures
Irish President Michael D Higgins is outrageously awesome.

Specifically, his argument against a Tea Party-loving man on the radio back in 2010 (before he became President) has recently gone viral. And it is amazing. Amazing. I ripped the audio from YouTube so that I could play this on iTunes whenever I like. It’s on loop while I write this. You absolutely must listen, and not just because he’s an adorable old man who speaks fluent English with an Irish accent.

President Higgins talks about how he lived and worked in the United States, and he has no shortage of compliments about the United States. He praises President Obama (while noting that he does not agree with some aspects of Obama’s foreign policy), and talks about how the international image of the United States is being restored, in part because of young American tourists and backpackers traveling across Europe, so that Europeans see first-hand that Americans are not represented by people like Sarah Palin.

On a personal note, the last time that I was outside of the US was in spring break 2003, and so I was on a ten-day high school trip (just with those art history and Italian students who elected and could afford to go) in Florence, Italy when the War in Iraq started. There was a lot of protesting (not against us, and rest assured that suburban high schoolers from Raleigh, North Carolina do not easily pass for anything other than Americans). On our parts, there was a lot of shame and embarrassment. It didn’t overshadow our entire trip (I definitely recommend spending a couple of weeks in Italy, by the way, and I am not typically a person who likes to so much as step out onto the porch), but it was certainly memorable. And I was definitely self-conscious the entire time of how international feelings towards the US had shifted from post-9/11 sympathy to become understandably negative.

So it is really wonderful to hear this wonderful man make these wonderful points. He also talks about standard of living (a “floor, below which people wouldn’t fall”), which is just about exactly my argument for health care. The first obligation of a government is to protect its citizens, but the second is to promote the nation’s standard of living (or “promote the general welfare,” as it says in US Constitution’s preamble).

Oh, and Higgins makes fun of Sarah Palin’s fear-mongering, the Tea Party in general, and uses the word “wanker.”

Enjoy.



You Might Also Like ...

Paul Ryan: A Legitimate Danger to Women’s Rights

Photo of Paul Ryan
I have to admit, I was pretty shocked when Mitt Romney announced Paul Ryan as his running mate.  I’d been almost positive his veep candidate would be female, in large part because Romney’s ratings among women are pretty abysmal.

Playing that card failed miserably for John McCain four years ago, but believe it or not, Sarah Palin almost seems sort-of-kind-of-at-least-a-little-bit acceptable when you take a closer look at Paul Ryan.

I knew relatively little about Paul Ryan when the news broke, other than that he’s a Congressman from Wisconsin and something of a golden boy in the Tea Party.

I received a forwarded e-mail from my mother today, however, that concerned me.  Deeply concerned me.

Now, the subject line was “5 Facts About Paul Ryan and Women”, and since I know what side of the political spectrum my mother hails from, I wasn’t surprised by its existence.  I get mass e-mails from all directions of politics (someone–I’m pretty sure it was my brother despite his denials–signed me up for Rick Santorum’s mailing list), and it’s always interesting to see rhetoric at work, to observe two completely different spins on the same issues, the same numbers.

In other words, I read all political mailings with a grain of salt.

Usually.

The e-mail I received today, though, a forward from Ultra Violet, was a bit different. It had the usual hard-swinging, attention-catching lines, but it also included footnotes … in other words, the wild accusations against Paul Ryan’s political stances on women’s issues are well-documented.

1. He voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Think women deserve to earn the same pay as men for the same work? Paul Ryan doesn’t. And the pay gap costs women and their families close to $431,000 over their lifetimes.

In a nutshell, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is, as its name suggests, legislation intended to ensure that women have the same compensation opportunities as their male colleagues. It is, to be fair, very complex and not as clear-cut as Ultra Violet would have you believe.

That being said, The National Review admits that “many conservatives question the existence of a wage gap in the first place” and that “instead of helping workers, the Paycheck Fairness Act could actually make their jobs harder by increasing costs to the businesses that hire them.”

2. He opposes abortion even in cases of rape and incest. It’s not just that Paul Ryan has voted 59 times against a woman’s right to choose—which he has. He would even rather let a woman die than allow her to have an abortion. He’s supported a bill to allow hospitals to refuse to provide abortion care to a woman, even if she could die without it.

Yes, this is also true. Frightening as hell, but true. In fact, Paul is not averse to women being prosecuted for having abortions. Prosecuted.

From The Daily Beast:

This disregard for the exigencies of women’s lives—the dismissal of their choices as amoral exercises of “arbitrary will”—was thrown into high relief during his 1998 run for congress against Democrat Lydia Spottswood. Both candidates backed a ban on so-called partial-birth abortion, but Spottswood believed there should be exceptions in cases where a woman’s life or health is endangered. “Ryan said he opposes abortion, period,” reported the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “He said any exceptions to a ‘partial-birth’ abortion….

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

God Wants You to Choose the Edifi Tablet

Photo of Edifi Tablet
I have a pretty eclectic collection of apps on my iPhone, ranging from a pedometer to Domino’s Pizza (which probably explains the need for a pedometer) to Walgreens (who knew you could refill a prescription simply by taking a picture of the barcode?) to a graphing calculator to … well, you get the idea.

The idea that there’s a Bible application, however, would never have occurred to me had I not heard about Edifi, an Android-based tablet that will hopefully “spread God’s word through a tablet”, according to Brian Honorable of Family Christian, the company behind the Edifi.

Family Christian is evidently trying to address the “inevitable intersection of technology and religion.”

Hmm …

Just for kicks and giggles, I searched “Bible” in my iPhone’s App Store, and there were scores of free downloads (and, for .99, I could go for the “Daily Audio Bible” should I so desire).

So why would anyone, even the most devout of Christians, opt for the Edifi, which sells for around $150 and is designed to be similar to Amazon’s Kindle Fire, when there are so many varieties of tablets?

From Fox News:

The Christian tablet is more than just an e-reader. It also comes with movie-watching capabilities, Christian radio stations, and even a web browser with built-in “safe search,” so the tablet is safe for the whole family. “We put that on there just in case it was given as a gift to a child, so they wouldn’t have access to things they shouldn’t have access to,” said Honorable. “We definitely had to tailor it to our customers.”

Ah, so there’s the crux of it. Basically, religious radicals are accepting that technology can’t be ignored forever, particularly by teens and tweens, so here’s a great way to control the situation, to micromanage the message that people are hearing in the hopes that they …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...