“Abstinence Only” sex-ed is being re-branded as “Risk Avoidance”, which is B.S.

 

In early March, U.S. Rep. Randy Hultgren of the House declared that America’s sex education is not enough. The stats don’t lie, with ridiculous sexually transmitted disease rates for those in their teens and twenties. Hultgren then submitted a bill that would spend $110 million annually for the next five years on grants to abstinence programs.

This is almost as ridiculous as the S.T.D. statistics. More ridiculous than the coke-heads we let grace our tabloids. *cough cough* States with more comprehensive sex education programs have much better S.T.D. and teen pregnancy statistics than states focusing on abstinence-only or abstinence-plus sexual education programs. Europe mostly does comprehensive sexual education, and it works tremendously better than America’s abstinence plan. This does not seem to matter.

The statistics have been ignored in America for far too long. Thankfully, Obama’s platform has been for comprehensive sex education.

The idea to rebrand abstinence only as risk avoidance is ludicrous. Sure, abstaining is avoiding risks. The real risk lies in how many teenagers are not actually going abstain, regardless of that type of education. The true risk avoidance would be to teach the full course. This includes the realities of sex, anatomy, pregnancy, statistics, contraceptives, S.T.D.s, and emotions. Then perhaps the adolescent is practically prepared.

Still, we need to get something straight with America’s lawmakers, members of school boards, and parents: the math is in. Teenagers who receive a more comprehensive sex education are less likely to get a S.T.D. or become pregnant. It does not matter if you are uncomfortable talking about these touchy and genuinely awkward subjects with your offspring. If they don’t receive a full education on the subject matter, then they are much more likely to fail.

What individuals should receive what rights has always been a discussion topic. We are past the time where only white men could own land and vote. America still has a long way to go in equality, from letting same-sex partners into hospital rooms to who has access to better health care. What should not conceivably be up for discussion are the rights of our minors. The youth’s future is entrusted to the adults. We are to teach them how to live, how to learn, and especially how to not ruin their lives before they have begun.

I’ve come to that age where some of my friends are deciding to have children. Considering my career path, they ask me “when are you supposed to tell your kids about sex?” The answer is, “always”. They are to know from the time they can talk what the correct names for their parts are. They should know where babies come from before they have the inkling to ask. Sexuality should never be an awkward topic. It is a part of all of our lives, for the rest of our lives. Give the youth honest and developmentally appropriate answers to their questions. This isn’t a subject that you want your kids to feel eternal anxiety about.



You Might Also Like ...

New Hampshire School Bans Safer-Sex Kits Distributed by AIDS Services Group

photo of condoms pictures

This is a bit of a tricky one, for reasons that I will explain in a bit.

The administration of a New Hampshire high school has stopped the sexual health group ‘AIDS Services’ from distributing safer-sex kits because the contents included flavored lube, candy, and condoms.  This occurred after about 70 kits were distributed to high school students during a World AIDS day presentation and “parents were upset.”

The group was then banned from the school district.

The group responded to the ban by saying:

it’s unfortunate some people are upset… the lubricant was included because it reduces …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Ineffectual Advertising: The New York Board of Health Uses Scare Tactics to Tell People to Stay HIV Free and Use Condoms

I don’t have all that much to say about the NYC Board of Health’s HIV-prevention advertisement, because I’ve said it all before. It’s pretty disheartening to see powerful organizations using fear to get a message across.

But, anyway, here’s a short schpiel.

This advertisement is completely ineffectual. This might sound inflammatory, but I’m deeply offended by this ad, and see no other way to respond to it except to be direct. All it does is attempt to instill fear into its viewers.

So lets go over this frame by frame. “When you get HIV, it’s never just HIV,” a scary deep voice tells us. “You’re at risk for dozens of diseases even if you take medication.”

First of all, that is a blatant oversimplification of any factual data about HIV. HIV does effect the immune system, which can potentially put an individual at risk for other diseases. However it is not as simple as ‘you are at risk even if you take medication.’ Because, to steal a catchphrase, HIV isn’t just HIV. It’s not a virus that manifests itself the same way in every HIV positive person.

And next we have close up images of the potential diseases you will contract! Osteoporosis! Dementia! And, in all of its bloody glory… ANAL CANCER!

Because everyone that has HIV also has anal cancer.

And, the final frame: “Stay HIV free. Always use a condom.” Good advice, but I barely noticed it.

OH! And! Everyone who is at risk for HIV is male. Clearly. I’m surprised that all of the men weren’t wearing rainbow pins to remind us that HIV is a gay disease, too.

The real kicker for me  is that on YouTube the advertisement is filed under the category of “education.” There is nothing educational about this video. It’s a scare tactic that reinforces the stereotype that being HIV positive means your life is over and you will never be able to lead a fulfilling life. Sure, it tells its viewers to always use a condom, but how about reinforcing that with facts about barrier methods rather than with pictures of bloody anuses?



You Might Also Like ...

Poll Shows That Sarah Palin Doesn’t Represent Jane Q. Public

Poster of Palin Supporting "Average Joe Six-Pack"

Oh, Sarah Palin, how I miss you.  I don’t know if you’ve stopped saying stupid things or hired better PR peeps or what, but it seems like the tides have turned against you nevertheless.  You’re hardly ever in the news for insulting American Muslims or taking it personally when college kids try to stand up to Big Brother anymore; nope, most of the latest buzz with your name in it was related to Bristol’s appearance on Dancing With the Stars.

Yup, if new data from Hart Research Associates has any veracity, it appears that most women (74%, in fact) view Palin as untrustworthy on women’s health issues.  As a point of reference, 54% view Planned Parenthood as trustworthy in terms of women’s health.

In the name of full disclosure, Hart’s survey was sponsored by Planned Parenthood.  However, survey subjects included an equitable number of registered Republicans and Democrats making …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...