Topless Hockey as a Form Of Feminist-Political Protest?

photo of russian topless hockey pictures
The 2014 International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) world championship tournament is set for Belarus. But a lot of people, such as the president of the European Parliament, Jerzy Buzek, all the way to the Obama administration, say that these plans should be suspended in order to expose the extreme corruption of President Alexander Lukashenko. The concept is pretty good in theory – kind of the way you take things away from a disobedient child to teach him a lesson – but the people being punished in this particular case are the hockey players themselves.

A Ukrainian feminist group decided to protest this decision according to Russia Today. The group, called Femen, organized a game of 2 on 2 hockey in front of the IIHF headquarters in Switzerland. Sound innocent, right? The twist, however, was that the women played topless. The women were clad in unbuttoned coats wearing nothing underneath, while others held signs that read: “Do not encourage dictatorship!” “Lukashenko, let’s play in Hague!” and “Slaves can’t play hockey!” Hm. Good way to attract attention, or just playing into stereotype?

The group later released a statement, asking sports officials “not to give rejuvenating injections to the rotten and dying body of Lukashenko’s regime.” They said that “the dictatorship is ruling Belarus by suppressing its own Constitution and fundamental human rights, suppressing all dissident attempts with torture and blood.”

From Russia Today:

The protest took place near the main office of the International Ice Hockey Federation in Zurich. Braving a severe frost, the protesters started a hockey game in the street wearing unbuttoned coats with nothing on underneath. Their demands, spelt out on banners, read: “Do not encourage dictatorship!” “Lukashenko, let’s play in Hague!” and “Slaves can’t play hockey!”

Femen also reminded the IIHF that top officials of the Republic of Belarus had been banned from entering the European Union and the United States following a series of human rights violations and complaints from pro-democracy NGOs and Lukashenko’s opponents.

Femen said several of its activists had been abducted and tortured by Belarus’ State Security Committee in December after staging a protest in Minsk.

Last month, the International Ice Hockey Federation said it supported the idea of holding the World Championship 2014 in Belarus, thus distancing itself from politics. A number of EU and US politicians have asked the IIHF to change its decision.

Thoughts?



You Might Also Like ...

What is Happening in Egypt, and Why You Should Care

photo of egypt protests pictures

Hopefully you are aware that there is major unrest currently underway in Egypt. I’m a bit shocked at how little coverage the protests are getting here in Canada – I’ve been watching the news all morning, and have seen one, five minute clip on Egypt, while I have seen the same reporter talk about a subway closure in Toronto every ten minutes (this subway closure has been scheduled for weeks, and the subway line being shut down is exactly 2 city blocks from a parallel subway line…I’m baffled as to how this is news). I’m not sure …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Anonymous Student Petitions Her School’s ‘No Touch’ Policy, Establishes her Awesomeness in Doing So

photo of hands off pictures

I wish that I when I was seventeen, I was as ambitious, well-spoken, and smart as this girl.

An anonymous student in a New England high school has begun to circulate a petition after the administrators implemented a school wide no-touch policy. The policy denotes that the only appropriate form of touch is a handshake, which would presumably ban hugging, having your arm around another’s shoulders, and hand holding. Here is some copy from the student’s really well-written petition:

We, the undersigned, call for removal of or significant amendments to the new “No Touching” policy at our high school. The case for our request rests on several points:

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Did Couple Temporarily Lose Custody of Newborn Because of Their Political Beliefs?

Photo of Oath Keepers Poster

Cheyenne Irish was removed from the custody of her parents when she was only 16 hours old by DCYF. This raises a whole host of questions, the most important being how compelling was the complaint leading to this action?

My gut says it had to have been pretty bad … I’ve had dealings with DCYF in my career as a teacher, and I’m at times frustrated by how slowly the wheels seem to turn. What made New Hampshire’s Johnathan Irish and Stephanie Taylor so horrible that the state removed the baby from their custody when she hadn’t even been on the earth for a full day? Even the couple that named their kid Adolf Hitler managed to hold onto him for three years …

If you give any credence to Irish and Taylor, it’s a witch hunt of sorts, with their inclusion in a group called the Oath Keepers playing a direct role in the custody issue.

While it’s kind of a moot point now, as custody of baby Cheyenne was returned to her parents after a court hearing last week, I find myself completely intrigued by this story because there are clearly a lot of puzzle pieces missing.

From WMUR:

Irish and his girlfriend said the state cited abuse and neglect claims. But Irish said officials also took the baby because they were uneasy about his involvement in a group called the Oath Keepers, which claims to uphold the constitution.

The state said it doesn’t take someone’s political views into consideration when they get involved with a family.

And, as you can imagine, the Oath Keepers are pretty pissed off themselves.

Members of the Oath Keepers protested at the courthouse and said the state unfairly used their group’s name as a reason to take custody of the child.

“People are worried that if they speak out or join some particular group that someday down the road, it could come back to haunt them or be used against them in a proceeding about their children,” said Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers.

Beyond the Oath Keepers part of the equation, Foster’s Daily Democrat contains some pretty specific information about why they were concerned about Baby Cheyenne’s safety.

While DCYF officials have denied that Irish’s affiliation with the Oath Keepers was a reason for taking Cheyenne away, they do make some very serious allegations against Irish and Taylor in …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...