Planned Parenthood as a Political Pawn: Not Progress!

Photo of Planned Parenthood Rally in Washington

Planned Parenthood is once again being used as a political pawn, and I for one am pretty annoyed about it. The group’s merits far outweigh the ugly birthmark some feel abortion services to be, and I do not get why anyone—anyone—would stomp all over the great good done by Planned Parenthood in terms of everything from cancer screenings to birth control … and that’s probably why I will never be a politician.

It is not my intent to bash Republicans here, by the way. I have a lot of close friends and family members that see the world from the right, and I fully respect their opinions. If they say, “I hate Barack Obama” and are able to explain this logically instead of spouting off racist rhetoric, I’m good with that.

I do at times, however, find myself biting my tongue because I want so badly to ask them how they feel about being identified by an increasingly ignorant vocal minority. Seriously, Republicans with a brain in your head, please take back your party! These nuts are reflecting badly on you.

And the recent stuff with the occasionally tacky Planned Parenthood, the basic arguments of which have been hashed out here before, is just one more drop of water in the bucket … but it’s a receptacle that’s getting dangerously close to the overflow point.

From NPR:

Just last Friday, for example, Republican Sen. John Kyl of Arizona said on the Senate floor that “if you want an abortion, you go to Planned Parenthood. And that’s well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.”

In fact, just the opposite is true; well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does is NOT abortion. Kyl’s office later said his …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Internet Wars and Lara Logan

Photo of Lara Logan Shortly Before Sexual Assault in Egypt

Lara Logan, a news correspondent for CBS, was beaten savagely and sexually assaulted while covering the recent chaos in Egypt. Basically, Logan was separated from her camera crew and security staff in the near-mob conditions at Tahrir Square following the resignation of Hosni Mubarak and was brutalized in plain sight among rioters before being assisted by Egyptian soldiers and a group of women.

Wow. This is a terrible, terrible story on hundreds of different levels.
Perhaps the most disturbing repercussion, though, involves the petty, mean-spirited, and completely inappropriate internet battles that are turning both a nation’s upheaval and a woman’s private pain into immature, insensitive interwebs spats.

From AOL News, which recently highlighted three of these disturbing pissing contests:

1. NPR readers versus NPR readers
Reader discussion became so brutal on NPR that the Two-Way …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

A Feminist Perspective of Sophia Coppola’s Somewhere

Last night, I was lucky enough to spend a quiet evening with some friends watching Sophia Coppola’s new film Somewhere. The film, which critics are calling a return to her Lost in Translation years, is far less heavy-handed than her recent effort Marie Antionette, but just as visually opulent (in a less obvious way). Although it was at times incredibly slow and I felt myself waiting for something to really happen, it’s definitely possible I’m just a victim of Hollywood’s plot-driven blockbusters. In actuality, it’s rare that so much happens in the span of a few weeks, or even a few days, as most movies we see these days demonstrate. Not every film is The Day After Tomorrow, nor should it be. Somewhere is impressive in that it’s a film where not much happens to only two to three characters. It tells the story of Johnny Marco (Stephen Dorff), an actor who does very little and cares about even less, until he’s essentially forced into spending more …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

The Changing Definition of Narcissism

Painting "Narcissus" by Michelangelo Caravaggio
While the quality of education in America has sunk ever deeper into the toilet, there’s been a correlating impression by many recent graduates that they know everything.  I realize this is not a new phenomenon—God knows that I knew way more in 1994 than I do now—but what’s fascinating to me is the way that a lot of kids in this generation kick around fifty cent words that they have a very foggy definition of (very foggy), ultimately changing the essential meaning of the word through nuance and ignorance.

Narcissism is one of those words, and it’s coming up quite a bit in terms of self-obsessed reality television stars, with Snooki from Jersey Shore going so far as telling Barbara Walters, “I think I’m fascinating.”

And so Snooki, who I’ve only read about because I rarely watch television in general and never watch reality television because I know enough people in real life that are far more interesting than idiots who transform themselves into a Barbie caricature or whatever, has become sort of the narcissism spokesperson for the “Me Generation” … but interestingly, narcissism (or narcissistic personality disorder, if you want to be precise), is reportedly on the American Psychiatric Association’s chopping block for inclusion in the psych bible Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

So does this mean that the self-obsessed are going to have to face some hard facts here?

From NPR:

In most cases there’s a difference between a clinical narcissist and one you see on TV, psychologist Keith Campbell tells NPR’s Audie Cornish.

“The thing that makes it clinical is when you go to the extreme where it’s pervasive, where it affects all aspects of your life,” says Campbell, who heads the psychology department at the University of Georgia and co-authored a book, The Narcissism Epidemic.

If you’re a clinical narcissist, he says, there’s real pathology associated with it.

“You can’t help yourself but try to get attention or seek admiration,” Campbell says. “It interferes with your life. … [I]t distorts your decision-making. It destroys your relationships.”

I know some people (not a ton, fortunately, but enough) that really fit this definition.  Most of them have very little reason to think particularly highly of themselves, which makes me think that there’s got to be some sort of legitimacy to narcissism as a mental problem.  There’s one guy I know that I can totally picture sitting and staring proudly into his reflection in a pool of water like the mythological Narcissus even as his children are hungry and his bills go unpaid.  Scary.

However, according to Dr. Campbell, narcissism is pretty much just “a manifestation of normal personality.”  If the proposed changes to the 2013 edition of DSM go through, a psych patient would instead hear about where certain traits place them on a “continuum or spectrum” where they’ll then be told, “You have high levels of traits that are associated with narcissism.”

Is the terminology really changing anything?  Is telling someone that he’s been diagnosed with a “narcissistic personality disorder” any different than telling him that he has a lot of traits on the narcissistic continuum?  I get ridiculously aggravated by things like this, where the essential underlying bottom line doesn’t change, but people have to fuck around with the wording.  It happens all the time in the education field, and sometimes it just makes me want to scream.

Especially because, in the case of narcissism—continuum narcissism or narcissistic personality disorder—the treatment (generally therapy) wouldn’t change a bit.  What Campbell is hoping for here is that societal perception of narcissism will be what changes.

And while things won’t change much for those on the couch, he says, the way we talk about narcissism in culture might.

“When this happened I went and looked at Twitter just to see what people were saying about it,” Campbell says.  “The most common response was, ‘It must be so normal now, it’s no longer a disorder.’”

And the second-most?

“‘Gee, I guess I’m OK, then’,” Campbell says. ”People see there’s narcissism everywhere, and they’re just shocked … that they’re considering getting rid of it. It’s such a perfect term for so much of what we see in society.”

Um … is it just me, or does Campbell sound about as knowledgeable as Snooki?  In a way, narcissism is a valid term for what we see in society, not just celebrities but us common folk, too … and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist (or a psychologist) to realize it.  However, is it really fair to give somebody a clinical diagnosis when they are merely reacting to a lifetime of being spoiled and indulged?  This is a question that’s going to be coming up a lot …

How many people are guilty of updating their Facebook status every time they take a piss or something?  My most recent Facebook update reads, “Picking up a sick first grader” because my daughter was sent home sick from school yesterday.  Does anybody care that my kid has strep?  Well, I mean, of course people care, but is there any need for me to announce this to my 500+ Facebook friends (no, I’m not cool … I just went to a big high school)?  Is there a part of me that craves those nice little “Oh, I hope she feels better soon” comments?  Probably … and thinking about that actually bothers me a lot.

Ultimately, the definition of narcissism in this day and age has to change.  With the advent of social networking sites where a lot of people chronicle their daily lives, often in real time, there’s a level of narcissism that has pretty much permeated our culture.

Thoughts?



You Might Also Like ...