Gender Role Guess Who

photo of guess who gender inequality picutures
 

Dear Hasbro,

My name is R______. I am six years old. I think it’s not fair to only have 5 girls in Guess Who and 19 boys. It is not only boys who are important, girls are important too. If grown ups get into thinking that girls are not important they won’t give little girls much care.

Also if girls want to be a girl in Guess Who they’ll always lose against a boy, and it will be harder for them to win. I am cross about that and if you don’t fix it soon, my mum could throw Guess Who out.

My mum typed this message but I told her what to say. 

Dear R___,

Thank you for your email. Please find below an explanation which I hope your mummy will be able to explain to you.

 Guess Who? is a guessing game based on a numerical equation.  If you take a look at the characters in the game, you will notice that there are five of any given characteristics.  The idea of the game is, that by process of elimination, you narrow down who it isn’t, thus determining who it is.  The game is not weighted in favour of any particular character, male or female.  Another aspect of the game is to draw attention away from using gender or ethnicity as the focal point, and to concentrate on those things that we all have in common, rather than focus on our differences.

 We hope this information is of help to you.

 May we thank you for contacting Hasbro and if we can be of any further assistance, either now or in the future, please do not hesitate to contact us again.

 Kind Regards,

 ASK HASBRO

Hasbro UK Ltd

00800 22427276

www.hasbro.co.uk

www.facebook.com/hasbrouk

http://twitter.com/hasbrouk

www.mymonopoly.com

These are two letters from an exchange between a six-year-old girl and a multi-million dollar corporation. The next set of letters consists of the six-year-old’s mother explaining to a corporation that this is not how you talk to a child. The corporation responds with a more suitable letter, but still doesn’t really answer the question at hand.

The question at hand is why, in the game of Guess Who, are there only five female characters and nineteen male characters? The mother, in her response to Hasbro, points out that being female is not a “characteristic” to be used as part of a “numerical equation”. Hasbro responded by simplifying their language and saying she could go online and print new characters to play with. If you can print more female characters … doesn’t that mean adding more female characters wouldn’t throw off the numeral equation?  Since you are condoning this behavior?

The bottom line is Guess Who is kind of sexist and a six-year-old pointed it out. Hasbro, a company that makes its living on educated and entertaining children, did a really terrible job explaining themselves to their target audience. I mean, “numerical equation”? I call bullshit. It’s a guessing game. There’s no numerical equation; it’s Guess Who! GUESS!

This has always been a problem and kids have always noticed it, and now, in the world of social media, it’s just heard more. Remember the little girl that freaked out in the toy aisle about all the blue toys vs. pink toys? Gender equality in kids’ toys has never existed and kids find ways around it. I played with G.I. Joes and my father’s collectible army models and an Elvis doll. My nephew? He likes to play with barbies.

The short answer to all of this is “You can’t put kid in a box or mold them to what you want them to be; they are smart and they will figure it out, and because they don’t have a filter they will call you on your shit.” Next time you play a game of Guess Who, stick it to the man and play around with gender roles. Take a shot choosing a male if you’re a girl and vice versa. Take that Hasbro! You can’t tell us who we can be!



You Might Also Like ...

Eight-Year-Old Girl Says It’s Cool To Be A Girl

photo of we can do it woman pictures
When I was eight- years-old I was the biggest tom-boy. I hated everything girly—including that fact that I was one. Being eight is an odd time for a girl, because you’re right in the middle between a kid and a teen. Eight is when kids start turning into jerks. They start finding their own way and pushing every boundary you put in front of them. What can I say—it’s what happens.

However, I was so pleased when I saw this letter from an eight-year-old girl hit the Internet, which reads (in its original spelling with grown up translation):

We have veginas [vaginas]. We get jobs. We are creative. We have stuff that makes us preanet [pregnant]. We have milk in our bobes [boobs]. We are smart. We have power.

This letter was written as a response to “why it’s cool to be a girl.” There are so many things that make me happy about this letter.  “We get jobs,” “we are creative,” “we have power” … that makes me so proud, and sixty years ago, stuff like this wouldn’t be on this letter. At eight years old, she knows that women have power. At eight years old she thinks that the ability to create and sustain life is cool, and that it doesn’t take away from her ability to be powerful, either.

The letter was posted on the popular site Reddit by a proud parent. And you know what? They should be proud and more parents should be like them. After hearing so much complaining about being a woman, how hard it is to be one, how unfair it is to be one, I’m glad an eight-year-old has the smarts to say, “It’s cool to be a chick.”



You Might Also Like ...

Rethinking Kids, Television, Violence … and Guns

Poster Against Gun Violence for Children

I was behind a truck plastered with NRA stickers at the Dunkin’ Donuts drive-thru today.  I remember thinking about how interesting it was that gun lovers feel compelled to advertise so passionately before telling myself that, really, anyone with a heavy agenda is going to be rather vehement with the bumper décor.

But then I got thinking about a recent story out of Logansport, Indiana about a 14-year-old girl shot in the head by her sister during a reenactment of CSI, and it got me contemplating many things, notably the ease with which children can get their hands on weapons and the glorification of guns …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Kathryn Jean Lopez Interviews Another Nut … And The Good Little Pro-Lifers Should Keep Procreating

Photograph of Notes on Kathryn Jean Lopez Article
Some interviews should just never take place.

Take the recent exchange between the beyond-out there Kathryn Jean Lopez, she who makes Michele Bachmann look rational, and George Mason University professor and author of Selfish Reasons to Have More Kids: Why Being a Parent is Less Work and More Fun Than You Think Bryan Caplan on Lopez’s National Review Online.

I consider myself a pretty solid reader, and I had to print …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...