Paul Ryan: A Legitimate Danger to Women’s Rights

Photo of Paul Ryan
I have to admit, I was pretty shocked when Mitt Romney announced Paul Ryan as his running mate.  I’d been almost positive his veep candidate would be female, in large part because Romney’s ratings among women are pretty abysmal.

Playing that card failed miserably for John McCain four years ago, but believe it or not, Sarah Palin almost seems sort-of-kind-of-at-least-a-little-bit acceptable when you take a closer look at Paul Ryan.

I knew relatively little about Paul Ryan when the news broke, other than that he’s a Congressman from Wisconsin and something of a golden boy in the Tea Party.

I received a forwarded e-mail from my mother today, however, that concerned me.  Deeply concerned me.

Now, the subject line was “5 Facts About Paul Ryan and Women”, and since I know what side of the political spectrum my mother hails from, I wasn’t surprised by its existence.  I get mass e-mails from all directions of politics (someone–I’m pretty sure it was my brother despite his denials–signed me up for Rick Santorum’s mailing list), and it’s always interesting to see rhetoric at work, to observe two completely different spins on the same issues, the same numbers.

In other words, I read all political mailings with a grain of salt.

Usually.

The e-mail I received today, though, a forward from Ultra Violet, was a bit different. It had the usual hard-swinging, attention-catching lines, but it also included footnotes … in other words, the wild accusations against Paul Ryan’s political stances on women’s issues are well-documented.

1. He voted against the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Think women deserve to earn the same pay as men for the same work? Paul Ryan doesn’t. And the pay gap costs women and their families close to $431,000 over their lifetimes.

In a nutshell, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act is, as its name suggests, legislation intended to ensure that women have the same compensation opportunities as their male colleagues. It is, to be fair, very complex and not as clear-cut as Ultra Violet would have you believe.

That being said, The National Review admits that “many conservatives question the existence of a wage gap in the first place” and that “instead of helping workers, the Paycheck Fairness Act could actually make their jobs harder by increasing costs to the businesses that hire them.”

2. He opposes abortion even in cases of rape and incest. It’s not just that Paul Ryan has voted 59 times against a woman’s right to choose—which he has. He would even rather let a woman die than allow her to have an abortion. He’s supported a bill to allow hospitals to refuse to provide abortion care to a woman, even if she could die without it.

Yes, this is also true. Frightening as hell, but true. In fact, Paul is not averse to women being prosecuted for having abortions. Prosecuted.

From The Daily Beast:

This disregard for the exigencies of women’s lives—the dismissal of their choices as amoral exercises of “arbitrary will”—was thrown into high relief during his 1998 run for congress against Democrat Lydia Spottswood. Both candidates backed a ban on so-called partial-birth abortion, but Spottswood believed there should be exceptions in cases where a woman’s life or health is endangered. “Ryan said he opposes abortion, period,” reported the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “He said any exceptions to a ‘partial-birth’ abortion….

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Sarah Maple’s “It’s A Girl!” Art Exhibit Review


Sarah Maple is an up-and-coming artist, and in her second show, It’s a Girl! she pokes fun at gender roles. From a white dress stained with menstrual blood, to a picture of a vajazzled woman, Sarah points to the absurdity of our culture.

Maple uses herself as an example in her work, and this time she’s less sarcastic than in her first exhibit.  Some say the female self-portrait has become a cornerstone of feminist art, as it shows us how we really see ourselves. Maple revisits this concept with the two portraits An Artist/A Female Artist, where artist Stuart Semple is juxtaposed with Maple – the Female Artist – in a nude body suit of overblown prosthetic femininity. Maple’s piece says that she’s positioned as A Female Artist, a freakish footnote to the neutral Male.

Maple has been compared to several other feminist artists – a comparsion she rejects and one she tries to distance herself from. However, her work and success does echo others, and like Emin’s, her success has been attributed in large part to having caught the eye of Saatchi during her final year as a Fine Art student. She is also keen to critique the ‘cliqueiness’ of the art world while participating in its games and simultaneously – and deftly –  promoting herself, placing herself centre-stage.

Maple’s discovery and rise to fame also raises questions. Is it sexiest to think that she’s made it this far because she was discovered by a male? And if not, who out there can deny the impact that it’s had on her career? The next question would be “How does Maple navigate this self-proclaimed feminist artist, ‘critiquing’ the art world’s pretentiousness while backed by Saatchi, the very person who perpetuates the cycle?” Pot … meet kettle.

Maple is only in her 20s and some would argue that what we do in our 20s is all hypocrisy anyway.  But these questions need to be asked because of the subject matter of the work: feminism. In ‘It’s A Girl!’, Maple’s reference points are obvious, Disney, Playboy, and, in ‘This Artist Blows’ (her first exhibit), the burqa, which is so often so lazily-referenced in our media as the only ‘symbol’ for the lives of millions of women. Is it art if it’s screaming that it’s art? Is it art when it’s all been done before?

But that’s the point, it seems. It all has been done before, and there is a new generation that won’t know. For instance, now we have “The Slut Walk” and people that it was an original idea, because they didn’t know that “Riot Grrl” came a decade before.

But the bottom line is that Maple is having fun, and having a laugh, too. Some have called her “toilet-humour funny, clever-funny, cultural-reference funny, and sad-drooping-Playboy-bunny-ears-funny.” And if there’s any remedy for hypocrisy or tiresome art, it’s laughter, and that’s good enough for me.



You Might Also Like ...

Komen Foundation’s Continued Funding of Planned Parenthood Discussion-Worthy

Susan G. Komen Logo
After an outcry from scores of angry women (my technology-challenged mother being one of them … she actually made me walk her through the steps of how to sign an online petition because she felt so strongly about it), the Susan G. Komen For the Cure foundation has done a 180 on its plan to sever ties with Planned Parenthood, and all is right with the world, right?

Not so fast …

Approximately $600,000 of the foundation’s money has been used each year to pray for breast cancer screening.  You don’t need me to tell you that screening leads to early detection, which leads to early treatment, which leads to a ridiculously high percentage of successful cures (if breast cancer is caught early enough, we are in fact talking cure, not remission).

What kind of highly public foundation makes a big thing about being “for the cure” (puts it into its very name, in fact) and then intentionally pulls money from the very demographic of women that need it most considering that they’re the least likely to get regular medical attention?

That’s got to be among the most asinine things I’ve ever heard.

And, yeah, it’s the A-word.

From The Atlantic:

Komen, the marketing juggernaut that brought the world the ubiquitous pink-ribbon campaign, says it cut off Planned Parenthood because of a newly adopted foundation rule prohibiting it from …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

“Fiscal Conservative” Tea Partier Owes Over A Hundred Grand in Child Support

Photo of Deadbeat Dad Joe Walsh

Hypocrisy is unspeakably distasteful to me.

I think that’s most of my problem with the whole Tea Party movement.  The gist of what they’re saying sounds logical to those who aren’t educated in the ways of politics, and they use that logic to prey on the ignorant.

Their M.O. is to make themselves sound like an average citizen struggling to get by, and John Q. Minimum Wage has no idea that most of the Tea Partiers are extremely wealthy.  They collect the votes of people with legitimate financial struggles in order to put plans in place that will protect their fortunes, often at the cost of us low or middle class citizens.

It’s sickening.

Which is why I’m always kind of excited when Tea Partiers are caught with their financial pants down.  It gives me hope that the misguided people following them in droves will see the light.

Congressman Joe Walsh of Illinois, he who has accused Barack Obama of “spending like a drunken sailor”, allegedly owes well over $100,000 in back child support.

For those of you unfamiliar with the child support concept, there is a standard …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...