Awesome Grandma Has Had Enough Of Your Anti-Gay Rhetoric

You guys may have read this story a few weeks ago (and yes, I used the same picture as the previous article did, because it’s perfect).

A twenty-year-old young man (and Reddit user) came out to his conservative grandmother, and their relationship was stronger than any anti-gay leanings or beliefs that she might have previously held. For months, she was uncomfortable at her church because of the pastor’s strong anti-LGBT leanings.

A high school boy is gay and his family attends the same church as the grandmother in question, and his parents wrote a letter to the pastor asking him what to do. The pastor read the letter to the congregation (and outing someone is a dick move on its own, but especially in that context), and said that they would all work together to address the “problem.”

The grandmother of the Reddit poster (who is not related to the gay high schooler) stood up and said: “There are a lot of problems here, and him being gay is not one of them.” She apologized to the boy and walked out. She was later told that her taking a brave stand like that might help to give other unhappy members of the congregation the courage to voice their disapproval of the pastor’s anti-LGBT stances (or even possibly to leave for a different church, if I understand how church congregations operate).

That is such a sweet story. And that grandmother is brave. I mean, really. How many people hear people say awful things and don’t speak up? How much harder must it be to speak up in opposition to a person in a position of religious authority?

More and more people, families, and religious congregations are realizing that anti-gay legislation, prejudice, and stances are on the wrong (and losing) side of history. Better yet, many are realizing that that position is morally wrong.

I’ll admit that I may have some mixed feelings about Christian organizations shifting to be openly inclusive of the LGBT community. It’s not surprising, exactly—any culture or religion that lasts adapts to survive, and Christianity has certainly done so over the years.

Contrary to the beliefs of certain insane people on the fringes of the Religious Right, my being gay and my being Pagan does not mean that I go to bed each night fondly dreaming of the downfall of Christianity. I do like pluralism and I would like to see people look for religions other than the religion of their parents. And there is something to be said for religions that were already fine with gays to start with as opposed to religious bodies that are just recently coming around to gays (and sometimes out of self-preservation).

That said, I want to live in a world in which anyone who is LGBT (or straight, obviously) has no conflict between his or her family, religious path, and sexual orientation. There is enough suffering in the world without religion, which should be a source of strength and peace, becoming an instrument of shame, doubt, and self-loathing.

 

PS: I said “anti-gay” rather than “homophobic” because “anti-gay” seems more accurate. A lot of us are accustomed to using the terms interchangeably, but they do mean different things. “I don’t want a gay roommate or gay guys using the same gym or bathroom,” sounds pretty homophobic. People who freak out when they realize that they’re at a party with a bunch of gay guys are homophobic. Anti-gay is a personal, religious, or political stance against gay people, gay sex, or gay rights (or, more generally, LGBT people, the sex that they may or may not have, and the rights which they possess which may or may not be protected under the law). Anti-gay sentiment and homophobia may frequently accompany the same people, but not always, and the terms have distinct meanings. Someone could have anti-gay beliefs and have no instinctive fear or unease around gay people, while someone could support gay rights in theory while being very uncomfortable around the LGBT community.



You Might Also Like ...

The Once And Future King Can Be Gay And That’s Fine


Parliament is likely to add an amendment to current legislation that will essentially allow for a simplification of questions of marriage and succession for William and Kate’s children (and grandchildren and further descendants), should any of them be gay. And we all know that that will happen—and not just because the Duchess of Cambridge totally looks like she’d have a gay son (sorry; I have Level Twelve Gaydar. It’s a blessing and a curse). There have been gay rulers before, and I don’t just mean speculation about British monarchs like Queen Elizabeth or King James (who produced, hands-down, the worst version of the Christian Bible that ever existed prior to the Twentieth Century). There have definitely been closeted men and women on the throne (any throne, really). And history has seen plenty of gay monarchs—particularly Roman Emperors.

Ancient Rome had a lot of problems, I know, but dang they were excellent in so many ways.

Anyway, this is a good thing. Members of the Royal family can marry members of the same sex and adopt (or do IVF) and their children will be in in line for the throne.

Now, it’s not a meaningful title—I know. The British monarch is the Head of State in Great Britain, but not the Head of Government. I’m all for constitutional monarchies, but if they have no actual power beyond bestowing knighthoods and orchestrating big events, I kind of think that monarchies are pretty silly. But, then, despite every name in my family being British or at least UK in origin (Harward, Lloyd, Wrenn, Yates), it’s not a part of my identity (my family’s been in the US for a couple of centuries at least). Who is king or queen can probably mean a lot more to citizens of the UK.

But I am still excited because lawmakers too often wait too long to update laws so that they make sense, but this legislation looks like it is set to pass. And that is wonderful. I would love to see a same-sex marriage in Britain’s royal line. More visibility for gay rights on a global scale is a good thing (especially with psychotic countries like Iran and Uganda still in existence).

 

PS: I know that the title to this post is awful, but it could have been worse. I mean, do you remember the Fairly Oddparents episode titled: “The Boy Who Would Be Queen?” I could have gone with something like that. That was a great episode, by the way. I was so amused when so many ridiculous people were accusing Spongebob Squarepants of being super gay, because, um, Fairly Oddparents was so much gayer. From Cupid (super gay) to Timmy’s Dad (who described Teen Singing Sensation Chip Skylark as “delicious”) to Timmy’s drama teacher to Jorgen Von Strangle’s relationship with Binky. Seriously, you guys. If only the sound effects on that show had not been so constant and if only everything had not gone downhill after Cosmo and Wanda had that baby.



You Might Also Like ...

Department of V.A. Discriminating Against Navy Vet

Photo of "Lesbian Veteran" T-Shirt

There are some laws in existence that don’t make sense to me and even some that I flat out disagree with, but I understand that it’s my responsibility as an American citizen to follow said laws. After all, if a bunch of people just started to ignore laws they didn’t understand or thought were asinine, chaos would ensue after awhile.

And if this makes sense to me, a mere citizen of the United States, one would think that it’d be a no-brainer for the U.S. government, but …

Well, it’s not.

Connecticut’s Carmen Cardona, an eighteen year Navy Veteran and a lesbian married to her “longtime female partner”, has been denied spousal disability bennies for her wife …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Man Claims GlaxoSmithKline Drug Made Him a Gay Sex Addict

photo of glaxo smithkline logo pictures

A 51-year old married father of two from France is suing drug company GlaxoSmithKline, saying that the drugs he took for Parkinson’s disease have turned him into a ‘compulsive gay sex and gambling addict.’

According to Fox News, Didier Jambart, of France, took Requip – a drug used to treat the motor side effects of Parkinson’s disease – from 2003 to 2005. Jambart says that, due to the side effects of Requip, he lost his family’s savings to internet gambling, stole money to feed his gambling habit and attempted suicide three times. He also alleges that he became:

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...