Another Reason to Breastfeed … Or is It Just More Propaganda?

When you hear the phrase “a woman’s right to choose,” there’s generally a quick synapse pop to the word “abortion.” However, I feel that the push to force women to breastfeed gives new meaning to the idea of choice … and it’s a meaning that does not reflect well on the medical profession.

Anyway, there’s a new study out that gives yet another enticing reason to breastfeed—it evidently lowers the risk of developing Type II Diabetes (the one that’s linked to obesity) later in life.

From Bloomberg Businessweek:

Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh studied more than 2,200 women aged 40 to 78. They found that 27 percent of mothers who didn’t breast-feed developed type 2 diabetes, almost double the rate among women who breast-fed or never gave birth.

The researchers say the differences between the groups held up even after they adjusted the statistics for factors such as age, race, levels of physical activity and body-mass index.

“Diet and exercise are widely known to impact the risk of type 2 diabetes, but few people realize that breast-feeding also reduces mothers’ risk of developing the disease later in life by decreasing maternal belly fat,” said Dr. Eleanor Bimla Schwarz, an assistant professor of medicine, epidemiology, and obstetrics, gynecology …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Research Shows that One Night Stands Can Lead to More

Who among us hasn’t dreamed of true love, of finding that one special person to share their life with?  Sometimes, however, we get bogged down in the Disney princess mentality and miss the opportunities that exist right under our noses.  And sometimes, friends with benefits, casual dating with occasional (and non-monogamous sex), and the odd hookup are just easier.

But according to recent research out of the University of Iowa led by sociologist Anthony Paik, these informal relationships aren’t necessarily a bad thing … even in terms of finding your one true love (if you believe in such a thing, of course).

From The University of Iowa News Services:

Couples who became sexually involved as friends or acquaintances and were open to a serious relationship ended up just as happy as those who dated and waited.

“We didn’t see much evidence that relationships were lower quality because they started off as hookups,” said Paik, an assistant professor in the UI College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. “The study suggests that rewarding relationships are possible for those who delay sex. But it’s also possible for true love to emerge if things start off with a more ‘Sex and the City’ approach, when people spot each other across the room, become sexually involved and then build a relationship.”

You know, part of me is really pretty excited about this even while my brain is screaming, “That’s freaking rudimentary!”

What this research is basically saying, after all, is that those willing to invest the time and energy and desire into making a relationship successful are more likely to be successful at the great long-term relationship game.  Therefore, it doesn’t matter as much if a couple start out as friends …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Despite Not “Reinvigorating TV News,” Katie Couric’s Future is Bright

When Katie Couric was tapped to anchor CBS Evening News, many considered it an attempt to “reinvigorate” television news.  It’s fairly evident that it wasn’t successful in the way it was perhaps intended to be (both ABC and NBC are ahead of CBS in terms of nightly news viewers).  However, Couric’s future remains bright as she has both a solid journalistic history (who could forget the infamous Tina Fey Palin interview?) and has tapped into new directions such as her webshow @katiecouric. Yup, perhaps the time for “anchorwomen” truly has come.

From New York Magazine:

This past spring, CBS News president Sean McManus and executive vice-president Paul Friedman discussed whether to try to bring an end to what may be the last great experiment in network news: Katie Couric, anchorwoman. Though her reported $15 million annual contract is not up until next June, one idea that was floated was for CBS to buy out the remainder of Couric’s contract this September and put in someone new this fall, according to people familiar with the conversation. Executives were perhaps also concerned about the bad publicity that might result from a long contract negotiation with Couric, especially if she ended up leaving. McManus didn’t want to make an early move, and CBS CEO Leslie Moonves was also against moving so quickly. “Leslie is incredibly supportive,” one person familiar with Moonves’s thinking explained. “Moonves and Katie have an excellent relationship.”

One thing that I can’t help considering is who they would put in as a new anchor should Couric get the golden handshake.  It’s going to be interesting in terms of feminism no matter what; if they replace Couric with a man (and correspondent Scott Pelley is the name most often thrown around at the moment), the message is going to be that, as a woman, she couldn’t hack it.  If they put another female into the anchor chair, it’s possible that outcries of “She only got the job because …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Hillary Clinton Poised to Break Another Glass Ceiling?

photo of hillary clinton

According to recent reports, Hillary’s Clinton’s star is far from fading. In fact, there are numerous possibilities that are being tossed around.

Buzz in the no-drama Obama administration is the seamless bond that has developed between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a Republican holdover from the Bush administration.

From Politico:

Gates, who has long signaled an eagerness to retire, just launched what appears to be his final initiative, a tough push to scale back the Pentagon’s gargantuan bureaucracy. Clinton, with her hawkish image and ties to Gates and to military brass, would be his most logical successor — and some of her most senior allies have begun quietly to float the notion.

What’s kind of cool about the relationship between Clinton and Gates is that they follow a Secretary of State—Colin Powell—and a Secretary of Defense—Donald Rumsfeld—who famously hated didn’t get along with each other. Hillary Clinton has shown herself to be the consummate Secretary of State, building bridges and seeing both sides of every issue.

There have even been occasions where she’s been more “hawkish” than the guy in charge of the military, most notably with almost threatening words to Pakistan following evidence that the recently attempted Times Square bombing was perpetrated by Pakistani Taliban. If links to the Pakistan government were verified, Clinton noted, “very severe consequences” would be forthcoming. And Gates? He merely said, ““It’s their country. They remain in the driver’s seat and they have their foot on the accelerator

Back to Politics Daily:

It would be a lot of grief to create one more crack in the glass ceiling as the first female secretary of defense. She’s ambitious, but I suspect there’s not enough payoff for her in that lateral move. And imagine the outcry if the secretary of state most associated with soft power were suddenly put in charge of hard power.

I don’t know, I think Hillary could pull it off. She’s proven herself to be a diplomat, but she’s also nothing like Sarah Palin incredibly intelligent and possesses the skills to put defense issues into a historical context. Hmm …

But there’s also another possibility being floated around:

It is plausible that she could trade places with Joe Biden at some point. If polls show an Obama-Clinton ticket is stronger going into the 2012 election, the president might well have Biden step aside. [Obama] could argue that the talents of each player are better utilized with Hillary in the White House. As the former chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Biden would be a natural at the State Department. He has long coveted the job of secretary of state and could argue it is a step up that takes full advantage of his background.

If the handoff were made after the 2012 election, even better because Obama will want to set up a successor for 2016, and it likely isn’t Biden, who would be over 70 at that point. But it could be Hillary, who would turn 69 that year, a mere pup if she were a man with national ambition. The rules have yet to be written for women of a certain age, but if she continues to play a prominent role on the national stage, cementing her standing with the American people, anything is possible.

So what do you think? Has Hillary Clinton reached the pinnacle of her career, or is she being groomed for something even bigger?



You Might Also Like ...