“Fiscal Conservative” Tea Partier Owes Over A Hundred Grand in Child Support

Photo of Deadbeat Dad Joe Walsh

Hypocrisy is unspeakably distasteful to me.

I think that’s most of my problem with the whole Tea Party movement.  The gist of what they’re saying sounds logical to those who aren’t educated in the ways of politics, and they use that logic to prey on the ignorant.

Their M.O. is to make themselves sound like an average citizen struggling to get by, and John Q. Minimum Wage has no idea that most of the Tea Partiers are extremely wealthy.  They collect the votes of people with legitimate financial struggles in order to put plans in place that will protect their fortunes, often at the cost of us low or middle class citizens.

It’s sickening.

Which is why I’m always kind of excited when Tea Partiers are caught with their financial pants down.  It gives me hope that the misguided people following them in droves will see the light.

Congressman Joe Walsh of Illinois, he who has accused Barack Obama of “spending like a drunken sailor”, allegedly owes well over $100,000 in back child support.

For those of you unfamiliar with the child support concept, there is a standard …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Women Now Being Paid to Keep Their Unborn Babies

photo of nervous looking woman in doctor's office

And what a great idea, considering the world’s economy is a bit, oh, shaky as it is. Let’s pay women who want abortions to keep their children because it’s a financially smart move and a great way to spend tons of money.

Not.

However, in northern Italy, that’s exactly what’s happening. Women who opt to keep their children instead of aborting the fetus are being paid upwards of 4,500 euros as an incentive to cut down on abortions. The reasoning, however, is disguised as concern for the country’s female citizens, stating that “no woman should end a pregnancy because of economic difficulty.” Because, you know, there’s not existing help for women who do want to keep their children, but fear how they’re going to manage raising a family with negative economic conditions as it were.

Seems to me that a big anti-choice movement is thinly veiled in coercion by financial incentive, if you ask me.

The payments are spread over the course of eighteen months and the woman has to prove financial hardship in order to receive the birthing stimulus package, and though anti-abortion supporters have applauded the move (unsurprisingly), the concept is being met by harsh criticism almost everywhere else.

Although abortion is legal in Italy, it seems that a subtle movement toward a pro-life stance is trying to take over.

Personally, and many of you already know my feelings about abortions, while I wouldn’t choose to have an abortion myself (under any applicable circumstance), I don’t think it’s the government’s right to take away a woman’s choice in such matters and I think that this “solution” to ending high rates of abortion is only good in the interim. A woman gets paid 250 euros a month for the first eighteen months of her new “endeavor,” but what happens after that? Abuse, neglect of a child that wasn’t truly wanted to begin with? Remorse and regret and resentment because dollar signs seemed like an almost-obvious choice at the time?

Hindsight is 20/20. It’s understandable that many women regret the decision to have an abortion down the road, but I think this policy could potentially do the opposite: force women to regret the decision of keeping a child, whether for personal or more selfless reasons.

Thoughts?



You Might Also Like ...