I’ve never really sat and watched multiple episodes of Sex and the City enough to really gain a solid perspective on the ladies and their story lines and I’ve never seen the SATC movies, either. From what I’ve gathered, the four stars of SATC have pretty much conquered various aspects of neo-feminism, all the while retaining their femininity. Did feminism need a television show to really reboot everything that’s been set in stone over the past few hundred years? It’s negotiable, but I guess every genre has to have it’s “moral” of the story. SATC, from what star Kim Cattrall states, has encompassed everything that a modern woman stands for.
Wall Street Journal’s Speakeasy interviewed Cattrall about the upcoming SATC sequel and Cattrall had some interesting things to say regarding the show and its pertinence to feminism. Cattrall states:
”Post-feminism has been really confusing. It influenced so many women to leave a lot of their feminine qualities behind and assume the business suit… That’s why it’s captured so many women’s imaginations. It’s truthful and it’s real and it’s now; it’s not dated, and it keeps evolving. These four women really make up one complete woman.”
While I th0ught certain characters in the episodes that I have seen to be the vapid type of woman that I really can’t stand, let alone want to emulate, she makes a good point. I’ve gained enough perspective from these woman to “see” what they’re like in conjunction with their story lines and in reference to one another; by Cattrall stating that the four characters encompass one kick-ass woman, I have to kind of agree. If you take the best (and worst) of the four female leads, you would get one amazing lady.
The show was supposed to portray four successful women living in a large city and how they adapted to constantly-changing environments in their personal and professional lives. While the show sometimes drifted in and out of what it was to be a “sad-sack” single woman, its good points kind of renegotiated its relevance to modern-day feminism. The women were fun, flirty, sometimes promiscuous — everything that pre-feminism had shunned with its big, brusque man’s index finger.
The women show what it is to be what they want to be — whether its a housewife or a woman who’d rather use their oven for storage instead of cooking with it. The show also tackles “traditional” female issues such as breast cancer, miscarriages, failed relationships and surviving thereafter.
After kind of delving into the unknown here, I think I might have to recapture some of the mystique surrounding Sex and the City. My husband (a totally metro and non-traditional male) loved the long-running sitcom and could probably give a pretty good synopsis for each season — I might have to sit down with him over an espresso and pick his brain. Then maybe, just maybe, check into purchasing the first season.
You know, just for scientific purposes.