Jul 08, 2010 at 10:56 am by Paige Feldman

photo of silver playboy bunny emblem

Since the early beginnings of Playboy, founder Hugh Hefner wanted to make it 3-D. Alas, Playboy has finally done it, but don’t be deceived: Hef doesn’t really dig the 3-D phase, now that he’s got it:

“I’m not a huge enthusiast of 3-D [these days] …  I leave real life to go to the movies and 2-D is fine with me.”

He leaves “real life,” (read: live boobies) to go to the movies in order to see 2D.  Heh.  Anyway, and indeed, the recent 3-D issue featuring Hope Dworaczyk is an ambitious departure from the traditional print world. Jimmy Jellineck, Chicago’s editorial director of Playboy, remarks, “In today’s print environment you have to create newsstand events.” And clearly, that they have, but at what cost, and at what necessity — for the internet can provide what you need — for free —  without the judging eyes of onlookers at a newstand. Whether it’s double-fisting, …

(more…)

Jul 05, 2010 at 11:28 am by Sarah Arboleda

picture of olivia munn at a red carpet event wearing a nude dress

In her new book, Suck It, Wonder Woman: The Misadventures of a Hollywood Geek, poor, unfortunate Olivia Munn was tricked by evil, gross-looking photographers to – gasp! – take off her clothes for a Playboy cover article.

I’m pretty shocked, too. I never thought I’d see the day when Playboy would want their models to go fully nude. Oh. Wait. I guess Olivia hadn’t heard about how empowering posing nude for Playboy is for well-informed women and their weight loss goals.

The Washington City Paper reports the details of Munn’s harrowing experience:

When Playboy offered Oliva Munn the chance to pose nude on the cover of the magazine, she declined. When Playboy offered Munn the chance to pose clothed on the cover of the magazine, she accepted. But once Munn got to the set, Playboy’s photographer, stylist, and team of handlers staged a day-long attempt to coerce Munn into taking it all off anyway.

If only she had had a contract ensuring that they couldn’t pressure her! But wait!  It turns out that she did have a contract, and yet Playboy still tried to pressure her! The scoundrels!

After signing a comprehensive contract specifying which specific areas of Munn were on-limits and off for the photographer—side boob and underboob, yes; nipple, butt crack …

(more…)

Dec 29, 2009 at 04:45 pm by Sarah Taylor-Spangenberg

kendra-wilkinson-vows-to-lose-baby-fatFormer Playboy Playmate and plaything of Hugh Hefner, Kendra Wilkinson, gave birth to a bouncing, healthy baby boy a few weeks ago and is now tackling the battle of the bulge.

Wilkinson states that due to a Caesarean section, she’s not been in top form to exercise just yet but plans to do just that in the coming weeks.  Kendra states that she wants to get back into Playboy shape and claims that she’s going to be a “hot mom.”

That’s all well and good, but I’m wondering if she’ll pose again for the famed men’s magazine.  Call me old-fashioned, but mom and nudie pinup are not exactly synonymous.  I don’t know.  I’m certainly not judging her because I’m not in any position to do so, but I do know that if it were me and I had been a former playmate (well, at that point I’d have had a ton of crazy fun with my super-banging body as I’m sure she did), I wouldn’t be in any rush whatsoever after becoming a new mom to pose again for a skin rag.  Maybe it’s the maternal part of me that even I like to push aside every once in awhile but I just couldn’t do it myself.

What about you guys?  Is it okay for her to return to a life of voyeuristic nudie-ness in spite of the fact that she’s now someone’s mama or do you think the two are entirely separate parts of a woman’s being?

Nov 07, 2009 at 07:06 pm by spasulka

57513300joannakrupa116200993035pm

Model Joanna Krupa — you may recognize her from Dancing With The Stars — is undeniably a beautiful woman.  She is also the cover girl of December’s issue of Playboy.

This week she spoke out about posing nude and characterized some feminists as “self-important” because of their viewpoints on Playboy.

“I think they suffer from lack of knowledge and tunnel vision. How many of those self-important, so-called ‘feminists’ have been on the set when a celebrity shot a Playboy spread? There you go. What is feminist about discriminating a photo shoot just because it involves female (partial) nudity that happens to give men pleasure? Pathetic,” Krupa told Tarts in an exclusive interview.

The opposing camps are so clearly defined on the topics of posing nude and porn.  Many women feel that by claiming the role, making the conscious choice to show their bodies, they are no longer being objectified.    Here’s the point I think Krupa is missing:  Yes, some feminists do take issue with the whole centerfold image.  Their objections don’t stem from a place of believing that breasts should stay under cover; it’s about believing that we, women, have so much more to offer than spread legs and augmented breasts.

On a personal level, I want my daughter to receive the message from me loud and clear:  she can blaze her own trail in this world, not one that is created, defined and managed by a man.  Women who actively pursue a stint in Playboy may believe that they are writing their own ticket, but the images in these magazines, the makeup and hair, the most commercially desirable body types are male-driven.  No matter who is making the choice for a woman to disrobe, she’s still doing it for a man’s gratification.  Why are women so focused on satisfying a guy?

Krupa went on to point out that posing for Playboy is one opportunity in which women get paid more than men for the same tasks.

“There are several great reasons why female celebs line up to shoot Playboy: finally a woman gets paid more than a man for comparable work, she gets to set the rules, gets to be in a real team work with other women, as many key positions at Playboy are in fact held by women!” Krupa adds. “She brings in her creative ideas, gets involved in the photo selection and ends up with something she co-created through and through.”

Rather than choosing the Playboy route as the career path that allows women to succeed, to exceed the monetary accomplishments of men, let’s instead use our talents and skills in industries that make a difference in this world.  Women have made so many advances in the past hundred years; it’s time to flourish on our own merit and abilities instead of continuing to rely on being the eye candy guys like.