In The Name Of Amina Filali

photo of amina filali pictures photos
Amina Filali was a 16-year-old girl who was raped. When her story was brought before a judge, he ordered that Amina marry her rapist, which fell under something called Article 475 in the Moroccan penal code. It allows judges to contract underage marriages in certain circumstances. This one was contracted out of a religious stand point that a woman must remain chaste.

After the marriage, Amina committed suicide, and her death has prompted Moroccan feminists to act. Fatima Outaleb is one of those feminists; she sits on the board of directors of Union de L’Action Feminine, an organization in the Moroccan city of Rabat that is aimed at stopping discrimination against women. She is also in charge of a shelter that helps women victimized by domestic violence, rape, incest and other forms of abuse.

Fatima and other activists are pushing to get Article 475 banned. She says, “Just think of a perpetrator who is supposed to be punished and go to jail, instead he can marry that girl?  But the government is still debating it. It’s a violation of children’s rights, in the name of honor, I don’t know what, to put a girl in the hands of her perpetrator.”

Fatima says it’s important for Morocco to take this step in banning Article 475, because it has been seen as a leader in changing legal framework to be fairer when it comes to women. But this law, and the fact that judges can still contract marriage sometimes for girls as young as 14, is still practiced today. The loophole in this would be that the marriages are done with “the child’s consent,” but can a 14-year-old or in this case a 16-year-old rape victim, make that kind of decision? Hardly.

Fatima also says that Morocco needs to work on guardianship laws. As of today, it’s all in the hands of the men. “I am a professor, but I cannot sign anything related to my child. If I want to move my daughter from school to school, I need my husband’s permission because he is the one who is the guardian of the family,” says Fatima. But this does not take away from what Morocco has done so far, and according to her, “Morocco is still the leader or in a leading position with regard to the reforms made so far. But there are some obstacles. Public opinion, that’s the big problem. Sincerely speaking, the king on many occasions has been more courageous than all those political parties and other decision-makers.”

But it seems there is still a long way to go.



You Might Also Like ...

Hey, Ever Hear of Burqa Rage?

photo of french woman in a lavender burqa pictures

Yes, that’s a thing.

The New York Post reports that a 63-year-old French woman by the name of ‘Marlene’ is currently being charged with attacking a woman in a store because the stranger was wearing a burqa.

Well that’s just awesome.

Upon seeing the stranger in the burqa, who is referred to as Shaika in the article, Marlene became infuriated and demanded that she remove the veil. When Shaika politely refused, Marlene attacked her, slapping, hitting, and biting the woman. Eventually Marlene did get Shaika’s veil off, at which point she then shouted, “Now I can see your face!”

Some insight from Marlene as to why she attacked a stranger:

“This whole burqa saga was really getting to me. To me, wearing a full veil is an attack on being a woman. As a woman, I felt attacked.”

“I’ve taught in countries like Morocco and Saudi Arabia and know how these woman walk three paces behind their husbands.”

“When I saw a burqa in a Paris shop, I thought it was very provocative … I just wanted to pull her burqa off. I know I shouldn’t have gotten angry, but I lost it.”

Now, in reading this article, my first thought is “What a nut job. I hope she gets a firm prison sentence and all other potential crazies get the message that this is not cool.” And I would assume most other readers would think along the similar lines. It is not okay to attack …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

French Senate Approves Their Controversial Burqa Ban, 246:1

The  French Senate has gone ahead and  decided to ban the adornment of full facial veils, AKA the burqa, or more accurately the niqab.  On September 14th, the bill passed overwhelmingly, with a vote of 246-1.  It is slated to become law early next year.

To make matters worse, any woman caught donning the niqab publicly, on top a rumored hefty fine, will have to take a citizenship class. Can you say indoctrination?  Sure.  I thought you could.

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Concessions to the Taliban Necessary to Get Out of Afghanistan … and Women’s Rights Not a Priority

No matter your political position, there is no question that the United States cannot stay in Afghanistan indefinitely. As the transition continues, it has become apparent that the Taliban is going to have to be part of any legitimate government in Afghanistan. Therefore, concessions will have to be made to reach core guiding principles that can be agreed upon by all factions including the group that aided and succored Osama bin Laden. There is no question that this realization is going to be detrimental to women in the country.

Time recently released an abbreviated version of an upcoming cover feature story focused on this horrible issue.

In June, Afghan President Hamid Karzai established a peace council tasked with exploring negotiations with the Taliban. A month later, Tom Malinowski from Human Rights Watch met Karzai. During their conversation, Karzai mused on the cost of the conflict in human lives and wondered aloud if he had any right to talk about human rights when so many were dying. “He essentially asked me,” says Malinowski, “What is more important, protecting the right of a girl to go to school or saving her life?” How Karzai and his international allies answer that question will have far-reaching consequences, not only for Afghanistan’s women, but the country as a whole.

The question of life versus quality of life is disturbing. Is a woman in Afghanistan better off being alive …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...