40 Years Of Feminist Journalism Courtesy of Ms. Magazine

photo of ms magazine pictures photos
A panel discussion with editors, activists, and bloggers was complied to pay tribute to Ms. magazine. Ms. was co-founded by the feminist icon and activist Gloria Steinem and founding editor Letty Cottin Pogrebin, and together they, along with editors Patricia Carbine, Joanne Edgar, Nina Finkelstein, and Mary Peacock, brought together the first truly liberal feminist magazine, which first appeared in 1971 as an insert in New York magazine. They were standing alone by 1972, and even in this day and age of self publishing and blogs, that’s hard to do. They most definitely earned a panel discussion.

With 40 years of journalism, Ms. has had many historic moments in it’s history: in 1972 it published the names of women admitting to having had abortions when the procedure was still illegal in most of the United States. It was practically unheard of, and you didn’t speak about such things, but Ms. did. They were the first fearless females. A 1976 cover story on battered women made Ms. the first national magazine to address the issue of domestic violence. The issue’s cover photo featured a woman with a bruised face, proving that Ms. would not shy away from any story. However,  it wasn’t all good and forward moving – in the 1980′s and 1990′s, Ms. magazine’s credibility was called into question and was subsequently damaged when it became swept up in the day care sexual abuse frenzy and moral panic about Satanic ritual abuse.

But after all this time, what has changed, really? The feminist movement is a slow-moving battle. As I mentioned, in 1972 Ms. magazine broke ground by publishing the names of women who had abortions, but the subject was still taboo and garnered even more attention on the topic again in 2006 when they printed the “We Had Abortions” petition. The petition was part of a cover story that contained signatures of over 5,000 women declaring that they had an abortion and were “unashamed of (the) decision”, including actresses Amy Brenneman and Kathy Najimy, comedienne Carol Leifer, and Steinem herself.

While it’s easy to become overwhelmed, or better yet underwhelmed, with the slow moving change, Ms. has done a lot: ”I always say Ms. changed my life, I would have been a more ordinary person without it.” That quote comes from Suzanne Braun Levine who was the first editor of Ms. The fight must continue and its continuity is pretty inspiring to see and hear, as the people who lit the torch are still apparently running with it. While all those women sat on the panel, the ones who “birthed” this magazine, sitting next to them were bloggers, like myself. They lit the fire, and they continue to fan the flames and it’s spreading. It spread to me, and it spread to Miriam Zoila Perez who writes for feministing.com and is a frequent speaker on reproductive rights. It’s also our jobs to carry the torch and light up the next group. Hopefully, some day soon it’ll go like wildfire.



You Might Also Like ...

Why So Serious?: The Iron Lady Faces Feminist Criticism

photos of margaret thatcher pictures photos pics movie meryl streep pic
Former Reason Editor, Virginia Postrel’s Bloomberg column was not happy with the new Margaret Thatcher biopic “Iron Lady”:

Hollywood has no trouble with public women as long as they are hereditary monarchs, who have no choice about their role. It can deal with the power of Elizabeth I, who had to rule to survive. But the more democratic, liberal power that arises from the combination of ambition, competence and popular appeal — the power of a Margaret Thatcher … is more problematic. A grocer’s daughter who becomes prime minister could be anyone (even if she is in fact an extraordinarily gifted person). Her ambition thus casts doubt on the audience’s own choices, or at the very least poses an alternative to them. Some people do in fact die regretting their unfulfilled ambitions and uncompleted work….”

So, OK. Thatcher herself, at least in my mind, is a feminist icon. She took on a career in which women were not allowed to enter. A female Prime Minister was not even a consideration and she turned that notice on its head. Screenwriter Abi Morgan described “The Iron Lady” as a “very feminist film,” noting that it had a female writer, director and star. She also acknowledged Thatcher’s “extraordinary” ability to combine homemaking and child-rearing first with her legal studies and later with her political career. “What’s interesting about her,” Morgan said, “is that I don’t think she felt the guilt that I think we feel. I think there’s an inherent guilt that most people feel. The thing I think most women struggle with mostly is feeling guilty.”

Protrel said “these supposedly feminist filmmakers could have portrayed Thatcher as an ambitious woman who had nothing to feel guilty about. Instead they chose to inject guilt where it did not belong. They obscured Thatcher’s public accomplishments in a fog of private angst. The portrait of dementia isn’t the problem. The way the film uses old age to punish a lifetime of accomplishment is.”

Which is a fair argument, but Postrel, to my knowledge and Google research, has never spent any time with Thatcher. So one could argue that everyone has guilt and regret and that Hollywood biopics are not, in fact, documentaries. I do believe the disclaimer “based on” tells people that this is not the entire, completely accurate story, and possibly not even a true story, it just happens to be based on this woman. Anyone who is using a Hollywood film starring Meryl Streep (who is phenomenal as always) as their basis for history isn’t someone you should be listening to anyway.

In my humble opinion, this is why feminists get a bad name. Many take everything too literally. It’s a film, not a historical text. That’s a problem with American culture: we celebrate Hollywood as if it actually mattered. It doesn’t. Can’t we just enjoy the popcorn and flashing lights of Hollywood and stop making everything so serious?



You Might Also Like ...

Mary’s Positive Pregnancy Test?

photo of mary mother of jesus pictures photos pics
There’s a definite dichotomy between the vision of Mary as a demure, peaceful virgin mother and a single, frightened unwed mother.

This past Christmas season, one church’s depiction of an obviously stunned Mary holding a positive pregnancy test led to a rather … well, decidedly un-Christian response from a more traditional

From CNS News:

A liberal Anglican church in New Zealand has denounced as “Christian intolerance” the defacing of a large billboard it erected outside its premises to mark the Christmas season. The billboard shows an apparently shocked Virgin Mary examining a home pregnancy test kit.

A Catholic activist damaged the billboard on Sunday, during a prayer protest by around 100 Catholics outside the St. Matthews-in-the-City Church, located on a busy intersection in downtown Auckland.

The man responsible for ripping the image, Arthur Skinner of the Catholic Action Group, said the church was welcome to have him arrested, and warned that if the provocative image was replaced he would damage it again.

“Even people who aren’t Catholics know instinctively you don’t attack the Blessed Virgin who gave us the savior of the world,” Skinner told New Zealand television. “To see this at this time is an absolute abomination.”

The pseudo-Renaissance style picture of Mary carried no tagline and the church leaders, vicar Glynn Cardy and associate priest Clay Nelson, invited people to offer their own thoughts.

“This billboard portrays Mary, Jesus’ mother, looking at a home pregnancy test kit revealing that she is pregnant,” they wrote when the billboard went up. “Regardless of any premonition, that discovery would have been shocking. Mary was unmarried, young, and poor. This pregnancy would shape her future. She was certainly not the first woman in this situation or the last.

“As in the past it is our intention to avoid the sentimental, trite and expected, to spark thought and conversation in the community.  This year we hope to do so with an image and no words. We invite you to wonder what your caption might be.”

Unsurprisingly, as caption ideas were …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Au Revoir, Mademoiselle

photo of france french women brigitte bardot picsThey say the English language is one of the hardest to learn simply because we have so many words for one thing. Miss, Ms., Mrs. – all of these are prefixes for women, each meaning something different. Miss, unmarried; Ms.- could be unmarried, could be married; Mrs.- definitely married. Bottom line, Americans cover our asses when it comes to language. The French, on the other hand, do not, and this has been bothering some feminists of Cesson-Sevigne. Special corespondent for the LA Times, Kim Willsher, brought this issue to the attention of Americans with her wonderful, through article on Sunday.

“Mademoiselle,” which is the Gallic form of “miss,” and is normally used for young, unmarried women, and so, feminists say, openly declaring them either available or unwanted. But that’s not the only issue with the title, before the French Revolution, the use of “mademoiselle” had little to do with whether a woman was married; a laywoman or commoner was always called “mademoiselle” to indicate she was of lowly status. Only women of high birth were addressed as “madame.”

Feminists were fed up with marking “mademoiselle” on forms and so they they started making noise about it, and finally they were heard. “It’s about eliminating all terms that could be discriminatory or indiscreet,” the town hall at Cesson-Sevigne, a suburb of the western town of Rennes, in Brittany, said in a statement explaining that the title “mademoiselle” had been banished from all official forms since the beginning of …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...