Is This the Best Way to Immortalize the Mother of British Feminism?

Picture of Mary Wollstonecraft
Mary Wollstonecraft, a major figure in British feminism, has been lighting up the circuits.

Literally.

In an attempt to raise money to erect a statue of Wollstonecraft, a hologram of her image graced a wall of the Palace of Westminster (a.k.a. “the mother of all parliaments”) as part of a campaign known as “Mary on the Green”.

From The Guardian:

Campaigners are aiming to raise £240,000 to pay for the statuary on Newington Green, in north London, near the site of Wollstonecraft’s former home and the school where the radical 18th-century campaigner taught. They also spent two hours handing out leaflets and promoting the fact that 77 supportive MPs have already signed a petition, including Jeremy Corbyn MP, who masterminded the turning out of the lights overlooking the Thames.

Whether or not a statue is the best way to memorialize the Vindication of the Rights of Women author has become significant as it underscores the lack of women literally captured in stone, evidently a worldwide problem.

Of the 5,193 public outdoor sculptures of famous people in the US, for example, only 394, or less than 8%, are of women, compared with 4,799 of men, according to the Smithsonian American Art Museum’s Art Inventories Catalog.

Earlier this year, Lynette Long, a Washington area psychologist and founder of Eve (Equal Visibility Everywhere) told the Young Feminists network in the US that this imbalance had a negative impact on young girls and their sense of equality. “Humans tend to trust the nonverbal, and the statues send a very clear nonverbal message. Girls can’t be what they can’t see,” she said.

So why go to all the trouble to get Wollstonecraft’s image out to the masses?  It might be as simple as the fact that statues of women, such as they are, tend to be of a generic nature.  While there’s the odd Abigail Adams or Phillis Wheatley commemoration, in general men rule the stone world.

Oh, and as to why this is making headlines?  It might have something to do with this …

The last time an image of a woman made headlines for its projection on the House of Commons it was a naked Gail Porter to promote a poll to find the world’s sexiest women. At least this time it is to publicise a campaign to honour one of our most radical and important writers.

So, what do you think?



You Might Also Like ...

The Olympics Make Female Boxing More Feminine

photo of woman in miniskirt baring midriff boxing olympic women pictures
Did you hear? The International Amateur Boxing Association wants to throw their hats – or their skirts, rather – into the ring for Olympic contention. On the floor for next year’s London Olympics? Skirts for the female boxing teams. Yes, skirts. And before you go thinking it’s for some kind of rational, “noble” reason like allowing the female competitors to maintain their flowery femininity, think again – the association claims that the miniskirt-wearing is so spectators can tell the difference between male and female contenders. Yup. From the Washington Post:

The official line is that skirts will make it easier for the casual Olympic boxing fan to tell female boxers apart from the men. Imagine the confusion, after all, if someone on their living room couch believes they are watching Daniel fight for a gold medal when who they’re really seeing is Danielle.

Isn’t that special of them? So considerate and thoughtful in case, you know, you had a bet going with a friend that Daniel – er, Danielle – would win the match. We wouldn’t want any kind of unwanted confusion, now would we? Better yet, to further address the apparent problem of telling athletic women apart from athletic men, let’s enforce a rule that all male contenders wear only barbaric-looking cod pieces. Right? I mean, that’s only fair, isn’t it? While the women flaunt their curves in miniskirts for the world to see, it’s only fair that the world judge male boxers by what they’re carrying below the belt. I mean, it’d make all the difference when you’re talking heavyweight and featherweight, now wouldn’t it just?



You Might Also Like ...

  • No Related Posts

Big Surprise: Sexual Harassment Leads to Health Woes

Cartoon of Man Slapped After Sexually Abusing a Woman

I suppose we owe a debt of gratitude to Herman Cain, in some strange way.  The seriousness of sexual harassment has come once more into the forefront, and that means that conversations are happening.

Important ones.

I realize that sometimes the line gets blurred, that people take things the wrong way, and so on … but the fact remains that sexual harassment is a problem.  A big one.

And Fox News recently ran a piece pointing out that there are medical repercussions of suffering sexual harassment.

Serious ones.

And the truth of the matter is, virtually all of these areas of concern are made …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

Would You Marry for Money?

photo of woman marrying for money pictures photos
According to new research, a third of women would. Well, at least a third of women polled. The women that I’ve spoken to over the last few days claim that they wouldn’t, so I either know women of “high moral fiber,” or I know more liars than I originally thought, you know?

A frequently-used coupon website in the UK polled its users and found that approximately 33% would, indeed, take up with a spouse in exchange for financial security. And I’m actually kind of surprised by that number, but even more surprised that I’m surprised, as we live in the day and age of Kardashians, where 72-day marriages and whirlwind courtships with buckets of cash fly freely. If you’re not surprised by the 33% stat, check this out further – of the women who claimed they’d marry for money, 22% stated …

Continue reading



You Might Also Like ...

  • No Related Posts